About Benton PUD
Products & Services
Save Energy & Money
Payment Options
Service Information
Rates
Facts & Figures
Electrical Safety

 

           
What's New Talk To Us Job Opportunities Links Broadband Contact PUD
   
   
 

Salmon Costs-How much are you willing to pay?

The Northwest salmon story is a complicated political, economic and social debate that involves scores of competing interest.  Recent court decisions related to recovery of endangered salmon have brought these issues to the forefront.  U.S. District Court Judge James Redden ruled on May 26, 2005 that the federal government’s 10-year plan for operating the Columbia and Snake River dams violates the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by not sufficiently protecting Northwest salmon.

There is quite a disparity of opinions on the cause of salmon decline, the results of current salmon recovery and what the best steps are for the future.  This costs your public utilities, and ultimately you as customers, millions of dollars every year through wholesale power purchases from Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).

For years, various environmental groups have pointed the finger at the hydroelectric system as the major cause of declining salmon runs in the Northwest. Unfortunately, those arguments are based on emotions, not scientific data. Meanwhile, it’s costing Franklin and Benton PUD customers over $26 million each year for fish and wildlife programs through BPA.

Each year, BPA spends nearly $700 million on salmon recovery, a figure that could go up $67 million or more because of Judge Redden’s recent U.S. District Court decision that ordered Bonneville to immediately increase the amount of water spilled over dams on the Snake and Columbia Rivers.

Redden’s decision invalidating the National Marine Fisheries Service 2004 Biological Opinion – or BiOp - is especially disappointing because the plan offered $6 billion in improvements to the region’s dams to protect migrating salmon.  The 2004 BiOp was based on decades of scientific research and the latest technology that would have made a very positive difference for salmon.  Now we have to go back to working on solutions that are patched together and don’t make sense for salmon or for Benton PUD and Franklin PUD ratepayers.  We must have solutions and decisions that take into account salmon protection and recovery, but we can’t continue to do so on the backs of our ratepayers.

The court’s decision lacks sound science, common sense, and offers little hope to help salmon.  Even more disturbing, it does not take into consideration the detrimental impact on the economy and increased reliance on fossil fuels that pollute the environment and contribute to global warming.  The court order requires an unprecedented increase in water spilled over the dams this summer with the supposed intention of helping migrating fish. 

There is no good reason to order spill this summer.  Past experience has proven that in low-water years, fish are better off if they are transported around some of the dams.  The court decision to impose a fundamental change in river operations was based upon speculative assumptions of dam breaching advocates.  During low-water years, we can protect our salmon while simultaneously using our dependable, clean, renewable source of power, but only if we’re smart about how we operate the river. 

Salmon have been returning in record numbers for the past five years.  Despite disappointing returns in one run this year, endangered salmon are still doing much better than they have in a long time. What we’re doing works.

The amount of money BPA spends on salmon directly impacts our power rates. BPA estimates that the court decision will increase its wholesale rates between 4 and 5 percent to recoup costs from lost power sales.

Fish and wildlife costs already account for nearly 20 percent of Benton and Franklin PUD’s customers’ electric bill. 

Franklin and Benton PUD are extremely active in the Coalition for Smart Salmon Recovery, a regional group that focuses on responsible spending and effective management of salmon recovery efforts. Jean Ryckman, Manager of Franklin PUD, is chair of the Coalition and Jim Sanders, Manager of Benton PUD also serves on the committee.

There must be a balance between generating power through our hydroelectric projects and protecting salmon - through a scientific approach.

Submitted to the Tri-City Herald by:
Jeff Hall, Commission President, Benton PUD – 509-582-1228
Bill Gordon, Commission President, Franklin PUD – 509-546-5973